2001 Northeast IPM Project

Back to 2001 Funded Projects

START: 01 JUL 2001 TERM: 30 JUN 2004 FY: 2004 GRANT YR: 2001
GRANT AMT: $127,711

INVESTIGATOR: Turechek, W. W.; Biggs, A. R.

PERFORMING INSTITUTION:
PLANT PATHOLOGY
N Y AGRICULTURAL EXPT STATION
GENEVA, NEW YORK 14456

REDUCED ANTIBIOTIC USE ON APPLES WITH REVISED MARYBLYT FORECASTING

NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY: Fire blight is one of the most destructive and difficult-to-control diseases of apple. Over the last decade, major changes in horticultural practices have increased the chances for infection and level of damage likely to occur. A common approach to disease management in the Northeast is to time streptomycin antibiotic sprays during the blossoming period using the disease forecaster MARYBLYT. However, MARYBLYT does not account for varietal susceptibility, orchard age, or inoculum pressure (factors that may dramatically reduce (or increase) the risk of infection). As a result, disease management sometimes fails and, because outbreaks are so erratic, often results in unnecessary treatments when conditions do not support infection. While many growers are willing to forego the cost of possibly ineffective treatments as insurance against the potential losses of fire blight, unnecessary applications are costly and can lead to the appearance of resistant strains in the pathogen population. This project focuses on revising MARYBLYT, a computer forecaster for fire blight on apple and pear to account for varietal susceptibility, orchard age, or inoculum pressure.

OBJECTIVES: 1) Revise MARYBLYT to calculate a system of `risk points' as function of the MARYBLYT risk factors, then using the revisions, evaluate various management-action thresholds for fire blight disease management based on the accumulation of `risk points'; 2) Modify MARYBLYT to account for varietal susceptibility, orchard age, and inoculum potential; and 3) Develop a user-friendly, windows-based version of MARYBLYT.

APPROACH: MARYBLYT will be revised using a combination of historic and new data using a the statistical procedure 'receiver operating curve analysis'. The revised model will be field validated in unsprayed test blocks. The modifications will incorporate flexibility into MARYBLYT; allowing users to choose suitable action thresholds based on variety, orchard age, inoculum pressure, and their comfort for assuming risk. Ultimately, these changes will reduce the cost of managing fire blight by emphasizing efficient, and minimizing unnecessary, applications of antibiotics.

PROGRESS: 2001/07 TO 2004/06
A) During the course of the project, over 243 historical orchard data sets from locations around North America and the UK were compiled and the predictive accuracy of MARYBLYT (MB) was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Historical data included climatic data during bloom, whether or not disease occurred, and when symptoms appeared. MB uses 4 parameters to predict blossom blight infection: 1) flowers open; 2) epiphytic inoculum potential (EIP) exceeds 100; 3) rain or heavy dew within the last 24 hr; and 4) average temperature greater than 15.6 C. Risk of infection is rated as low, moderate, high, or infection depending upon whether one, two, three or all 4 of the thresholds have been exceeded, respectively. Although infection is predicted only when all 4 thresholds are exceeded, infections can occur in less favourable conditions, i.e., when only 2 or 3 thresholds are exceeded. In practice, any combination of those 4 thresholds could be used as a rule to trigger a management action. ROC analysis permits us to evaluate each possible combination of thresholds individually as a rule to trigger management action. For each data set, the historical weather data was run through MB and, for each possible rule, it was recorded whether infection was predicted or not, and the prediction was compared to what actually occurred. For each rule, the true positive proportion (TPP), defined as the number of true positives per number of data sets with disease, and the false positive proportion (FPP), the number of false positives per number of data sets without disease, were recorded. A perfect rule would have a ratio between TPP and FPP of 1:0. The number of correct decisions when all the data were combined was highest using the rule that predicts infection. The TPP:FPP ratio was 0.73:0.41. The worst rule, 0.95:0.80, occurred when using temperature and blossoming as the sole parameters for predicting fire blight. On the whole the forecaster was predicting significantly better than chance (0.50) as is shown by the 95 percent confidence interval (CI) of the area under the ROC curve. The area was found to be between 0.61 and 0.73 and is an indication of the probability of a correct decision. To investigate regional differences, the data were separated into East Coast North America, West Coast North America and England. MB performed best in England where the area under the ROC curve had a 95 percent CI of 0.55 to 0.88. Once again, the infection rule performed best with a TPP:FPP ratio of 0.73:0.27. The worst performance was using the West Coast data where the 95 percent CI was 0.46 to 0.76 meaning that MB was not forecasting better than chance. However, the TPP:FPP ratio for the West Coast was 0.65:0.32 when using the infection rule. B) The software has been upgraded and converted into a Windows-based format. Additions include: auto sensing for Fahrenheit or Celsius and a global threshold option that will allow the operator to customize changes. Data is now stored in an ASCII format and can be edited with any text editor software. This eliminates the proprietary data storage structure of the old system.

IMPACT: 2001/07 TO 2004/06
A better understanding of the predictive abilities of both MB and CB has evolved from this research. Scientists and consultants are learning the strengths and weaknesses of both forecasters and can now use this information to better choose forecaster and formulate management recommendations based on the forecaster output. Moreover, the current results have directed our research focus to where MB needs greatest improvement. The new windows version of MB is long anticipated by the industry and should be well-received because of its ease in use as well as its lower cost.

PUBLICATIONS: 2001/07 TO 2004/06
No publications reported this period

PROJECT CONTACT:
Name: NYG-Turechek, W. W.
Phone: 315-787-2474
Fax: 315-787-2389
Email: wwt3@cornell.edu