![]() |
|||
|
March
2002
| |||
|
Inside Maintaining a solid foundation: federal base funding for state IPM programs Imagine the PossibilitiesHighlights
from other states: Managing house flies on Delaware dairy farms For more information on IPM in the Northeast, visit our website at northeastipm.org or contact regional IPM facilitator, Jim VanKirk (315.787.2378; jrv1@cornell.edu), or information specialist Liz Thomas (315.787.2626; egt3@cornell.edu) NYS IPM Program Office, NYSAES, 630 W. North Street, Geneva, NY 14456. Publication supported by CSREES, USDA, special project number 99-34103-7391. Writing and design: Elizabeth Myers (315-787-2624; ebm24@cornell.edu). |
In the States... |
Massachusetts IPM Budget Cut
| |
|
Maine New
York |
Vermont West
Virginia |
In recent years, the Massachusetts Department of Food and Agriculture, through a contract with the UMass extension, earmarked between $250,000 and $350,000 in state funding to support its IPM program. This year, however, Governor Swift has line-item vetoed most these funds, leaving the program largely dependent on its federal Smith-Lever 3(d) IPM funds. The Massachusetts Department of Food & Agriculture did provide approximately $121,000 to continue support of the School IPM project, but the rest of the program has taken a tremendous hit. The program will use federal base funding in an effort to maintain its basic infrastructure and continue limited support to the apple, cranberry, vegetable, and greenhouse IPM projects, but key planned activities have been halted. For example, the program was launching a response to pumpkin growers requests for intensive monitoring efforts to help control disease and insect pests on this high-value crop. Now these and other plans to assist producers must be curtailed or eliminated. The program has tried to avoid layoffs by moving most IPM staffers to grant-based projects, but the limited time frame for these projects places the states valuable IPM personnel resources at risk in the long term. Although competitive grants have helped to keep the IPM team intact for now, state IPM Coordinator William Coli points out that grants are often more easily won by states whose programs are located at large universities that supplement the states support with resources that enable IPM specialists to compete more successfully for funding. Coli emphasizes that without continued federal base funding, Massachusetts likely would not have a program at all. | |
About this Page
Northeast IPM News March 2002 page 4
Created 4/15/02 by Liz Myers and Jim VanKirk